Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 85540 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2002 13:37:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jul 2002 13:37:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 23984 invoked by uid 97); 11 Jul 2002 13:37:21 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 23968 invoked by uid 97); 11 Jul 2002 13:37:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 23956 invoked by uid 98); 11 Jul 2002 13:37:20 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4198 created Apr 24 2002) To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Subject: Re: [Fwd: [HttpClient][PATCH] Correction to addHostRequestHeader +minor formatting cleanups] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Build V60_M13_04302002 Pre-release 2 April 30, 2002 From: dion@multitask.com.au Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 23:51:07 +1000 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on gateway/Multitask Consulting/AU(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 07/11/2002 11:51:10 PM, Serialize complete at 07/11/2002 11:51:10 PM Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0048E8E74A256BF3_=" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N --=_alternative 0048E8E74A256BF3_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" I don't see how an IP address can't be considered an internet hostname. What if I send a GET / HTTP/1.1 to http://192.168.0.1? If the hostname isn't part of the uri and it isn't the IP address, it should be left blank and the GET / would fail, right? -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Work: http://www.multitask.com.au Developers: http://adslgateway.multitask.com.au/developers Ryan Lubke wrote on 07/11/2002 10:57:10 PM: > > > > > > > So you are saying that because an ipaddress is not an internet host > > > name, the header field must be present but with an empty value. Seems > > > like a reasonable intreptation. Can anyone confirm that? > > I dunno....an IP address sounds like a host name to me in the absence of > > anything else... > > > But should an IP address be considered the same as an internet host > name? I don't think they should be considered equivalent. > > Anyone else have input on this? > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > For additional commands, e-mail: > --=_alternative 0048E8E74A256BF3_=--