Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 77116 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2002 22:59:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by 209.66.108.5 with SMTP; 1 Jul 2002 22:59:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 14312 invoked by uid 97); 1 Jul 2002 22:59:15 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 14261 invoked by uid 97); 1 Jul 2002 22:59:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 14249 invoked by uid 98); 1 Jul 2002 22:59:14 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4198 created Apr 24 2002) Message-ID: <007b01c22153$6b825160$5c3929d9@oemcomputer> From: "Stephen Colebourne" To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" References: <000101c22148$0c6e91d0$6501a8c0@LT1> Subject: Re: [lang] is there a release on the visible horizon? Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 00:01:34 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Spam-Rating: 209.66.108.5 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: 209.66.108.5 1.6.2 0/1000/N +1, please submit a patch Stephen ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rand McNeely" To: "'Jakarta Commons Developers List'" Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:41 PM Subject: RE: [lang] is there a release on the visible horizon? > > > > > > > 6) Numbers has a lot of comments about future things. Plus > > containsDigits() > > > > has question marks against the null handling > > > > > > Question marks meaning, should containsDigit consider null to > contain > > > digits or not, or should it not even check. > > Or should it throw an exception (and which one) > > > > I think the current implementation for nulls is fine but there is one > other problem, the method will return true if passed "". I can go ahead > and take care of this. > > Rand > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > For additional commands, e-mail: > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: