commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henri Yandell <bay...@generationjava.com>
Subject RE: [lang] JDK 1.0/1.1
Date Thu, 11 Jul 2002 18:30:49 GMT
Not a good solution. We have to code to com.sun.collections and java.util?
Or is this something the dbcp stuff takes care of?

I've seen some places publishing a hacked collections.jar which uses
java.util naming, but apart from being illegal, is a pain to plugin.

Hen

On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Scott Sanders wrote:

> No, we make the user install collections.jar.  They have gone through
> the trouble to find commons-lang, finding collections.jar from sun is
> not that much harder :)
>
> Scott
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Henri Yandell [mailto:bayard@generationjava.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 6:11 AM
> > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> > Subject: RE: [lang] JDK 1.0/1.1
> >
> >
> > Yep. I see no reason for the current code base to not support
> > 1.1 as it practically does, but when new features for 1.3/1.4
> > come along, a conditional compilation would make a lot of sense.
> >
> > The only real painful bit is, do we try to use Hashtable and
> > Vector where possible to keep classes at 1.1?
> >
> > Hen
> >
> > On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Scott Sanders wrote:
> >
> > > I was only stating that I am happy to have 1.1 support if
> > we don't use
> > > that as a banner to NOT have 1.3/1.4 features.  Kind of like the
> > > conditional compilation that DBCP does.  Does that make sense?
> > >
> > > Scott
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Henri Yandell [mailto:bayard@generationjava.com]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 12:16 PM
> > > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> > > > Subject: RE: [lang] JDK 1.0/1.1
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I think I'm starting to misuse the -1/+1 terminogy a bit
> > :) I find
> > > > myself being +1 or -1 things at work as well. Jakarta has
> > warped me.
> > > >
> > > > Complaint was the wrong word. I should have said:
> > > >
> > > > I'm -1 Scott's -0.
> > > >
> > > > Erm. That's very confusing isn't it. Sorry.
> > > >
> > > > The actual reason for being against your reasoning on the
> > > > reflect.* 1.3 stuff, was that there's nice 1.4 stuff as well that
> > > > exceptions.* could link to, so where do we stop?
> > > >
> > > > Hen
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Scott Sanders wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > Yeah, I'm -1 Scott's complaint.
> > > > >
> > > > > Henry, what do you mean by this?  I am just wondering.
> > > > >
> > > > > Scott
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > <mailto:commons-dev-> unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> > > > For
> > > > additional commands,
> > > > e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > <mailto:commons-dev-> unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> > > For
> > additional commands,
> > e-mail:
> > > <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > <mailto:commons-dev-> unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> > For
> > additional commands,
> > e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> >
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message