commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nicola Ken Barozzi <>
Subject Re: [VOTE][IO] Promotion of the io packages out of the Sandbox into the wild
Date Sun, 14 Jul 2002 09:41:48 GMT

Henri Yandell wrote:
> Linked slightly to some conversation in [lang]. I've noticed that the IO
> package appears to have some issues in its utility files.
> 1) Some are named xxxUtil others are named xxxUtils, with no apparant
> convention.
> 2) There is a FileUtil and FileUtils.
> It seems to me that getting the filenames and directories they live in
> right is one of the most important things before migrating to a new cvs
> location to allow the audit trail to remain as obvious as possible.
> I'm assuming these issues would need to be dealt with before release.

Since you definately know more than me on these conventions (and since I 
haven't followed the one on land ;-), could you please summarize the 
results and propose the giudelines and changes?

It would be great, and I'd make the change in no time :-)

Nicola Ken Barozzi         
             - verba volant, scripta manent -
    (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)

To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <>
For additional commands, e-mail: <>

View raw message