commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Stephen Colebourne" <scolebou...@btopenworld.com>
Subject Re: [lang] Reflection or not?
Date Tue, 09 Jul 2002 20:18:10 GMT
Just to clarify, my impression is that the BeanUtils guys will _probably_
support reflect in Lang, but _only_ once Lang is in commons proper. Hence
the two part promotion.

Stephen

----- Original Message -----
From: "Henri Yandell" <bayard@generationjava.com>
To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 7:40 AM
Subject: Re: [lang] Reflection or not?


>
> The shorter we spend in Commons proper before a release, the worse the
> view will be I believe. I also want us to be able to say "okay, adding in
> system or reflect or xxx is causing us too much pain, let's dump it",
> without it having affected the current functionalities too much, or the
> drive to a release.
>
> Mainly I've been seeing it as 'cleaning', 'vote commons proper', 'new
> code', 'vote release'. As well as system and reflect we also have some
> other code from Avalon to consider.
>
> Another reason is cvs. Adding lots of code only to confuse/lose its audit
> trail seems a bit of a pain. It'd be nice to bring over a good [as in lots
> of tests and docs] then proceed as normal.
>
> The only significant issue would appear to be the Classes class. It's
> tempting to make this package-private so that it's not on an initial API.
>
> Let me know if I'm blatantly wrong though,
>
> Hen
>
> On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, [iso-8859-1] Ringo De Smet wrote:
>
> > Henri,
> >
> >  --- Henri Yandell <bayard@generationjava.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 from me. I think we can consider [core-reflect] to be an aimed for
> > > solution to go into Lang once it is in Commons proper and hopefully
> > > before a 1.0 release.
> >
> > You want the promotion to commons proper first and then discuss about
> > adding the reflect before a 1.0 release? Why the promotion first then?
> > Can't we get the sources in place first in the sandbox and then promote
> > the whole thing to proper, directly followed by a 1.0 release?
> > I must be missing something... :-/
> >
> > Ringo
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Everything you'll ever need on one web page
> > from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
> > http://uk.my.yahoo.com
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message