Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 98820 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2002 20:03:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jun 2002 20:03:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 1196 invoked by uid 97); 22 Jun 2002 20:03:22 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 1180 invoked by uid 97); 22 Jun 2002 20:03:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 1160 invoked by uid 98); 22 Jun 2002 20:03:21 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4198 created Apr 24 2002) X-Authentication-Warning: champion.sslsecure.com: iammichael owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 15:03:12 -0500 (CDT) From: "Michael A. Smith" X-X-Sender: iammichael@champion.sslsecure.com To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [Collections] Naming conventions In-Reply-To: <005901c219d5$1c636680$376427d9@oemcomputer> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Sat, 22 Jun 2002, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > > > I'm not sure we need to take a formal vote. Everyone participating on > > > the mailing list seems to agree (either implicitly by not saying > > > anything or with explicit approval). I'll commit it into CVS tonight > > > and if anyone objects, they can just -1 my patch and we'll see if we can > > > address the reasons for the veto. > > > > I didn't get to formatting all the naming conventions into a suitable > > format for checking into CVS. Spent too much time trying to figure out > > why tests were failing in JDK 1.2, but not in 1.3 and 1.4 (see the > > commit message a couple of minutes ago). > > > > I'll get to it, just not today. > > I'm assuming you were referring to the document, not the changes to the > code. Any problems with me becoming a committer to collections making the > changes to PredicateUtils and LazyCollections to bring them in line? Yes, I was referring to the document, not the changes to the code. I'm fine with you adding your name to the STATUS file and make changes to code; although, with Aaron's recent comments, you may want to hold off a bit. regards, michael -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: