Return-Path: 
 <commons-dev-return-10072-qmlist-jakarta-archive-commons-dev=jakarta.apache.org@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@apache.org
Received: (qmail 18682 invoked from network); 24 Jun 2002 13:48:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jun 2002 13:48:27 -0000
Received: (qmail 24126 invoked by uid 97); 24 Jun 2002 13:48:32 -0000
Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 24084 invoked by uid 97); 24 Jun 2002 13:48:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:commons-dev-subscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <commons-dev.jakarta.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 24071 invoked by uid 98); 24 Jun 2002 13:48:31 -0000
X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4198 created Apr 24 2002)
Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.0.20020624152421.03309008@localhost>
X-Sender: baliuka/taurus.mediaworks.lt@localhost
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 15:51:19 +0200
To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>,
        Jakarta Commons Developers List <commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
From: Juozas Baliuka <baliuka@mwm.lt>
Subject: Re: unmavenising Commons projects
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0206240813590.29609-100000@champion.sslsecur
 e.com>
References: <1024911873.18098.31.camel@oasis>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N


Yes,
  it is good to have common process to build commons,
I prefer minimalism for building,
it is very good  to have tools for site generation and dependency download,
but they must not be a dependency  to build "jar" or to run tests.
Users and contributors must be able to build code and to run tests as 
trivial as possible.

At 08:16 2002.06.24 -0500, Michael A. Smith wrote:
>On 24 Jun 2002, John Keyes wrote:
> > Folks the discussion here should not be about what GUMP is or
> > what Maven is.  It should be about standardizing the build
> > process for Commons.
>
>Hmmm...  Maybe I should have been paying more attention to this thread.
>I didn't realize there was talk about standardizing build process for
>all of commons.
>
> > It seems that the general consensus is that to satisfy all
> > parties there should be two ant projects, build.xml and
> > build-maven.xml.  Could this issue be resolved with just one
> > project, build.xml.
> >
> > The default target for this project must generate the binary
> > distribution.  If the default target is 'dist' then both scenarios
> > could be accomodated as follows:
>
>I'm not so sure about tha.  Currently, collections has the tests run as
>the default project (compiling anything as necessary).  I feel it's a
>good thing to have the full test suite run by default, and I wouldn't
>want that to change
>
> > <target name="dist" depends="ant-dist, maven-dist"/>
> >
> > <target name="ant-dist" unless="maven.home">
> >   ...
> > </target>
> >
> > <target name="maven-dist" if="maven.home">
> >   ...
> > </target>
>
>regards,
>michael
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>