commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Michael A. Smith" <...@apache.org>
Subject RE: [collection] Collections for primitives
Date Tue, 25 Jun 2002 17:13:34 GMT
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Jack, Paul wrote:
> > Yes, I remember arguing before in this thread that false was 
> > more useful
> > than an exception for contains(Object). Also -1 for indexOf() 
> > and false for
> > remove(). So yes I would like to see the primitive 
> > collections changed.
> 
> What do you think of having an additional set of decorators
> for making "fail-fast" collections permissive?  Eg, a 

I'm still curious what the use-case is for a situation that would 
require non-"fail-fast" collections.  I understand the theory, I just 
want to hear how it would be used in practice.

regards,
michael



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message