commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Michael A. Smith" <>
Subject [VOTE][Collections] Naming conventions
Date Sat, 22 Jun 2002 21:16:23 GMT
There has been recent discussion on this list about forming naming 
conventions for the collections component to ensure consistency within 
the collections API as more and more collection "decorators" are added.  
The discussion culminated in a summary by Stephen:
[use whatever archive you prefer]

Since the changes are considered a product change, they are governed by
the lazy consensus voting rules which state that approval is assumed
until a -1 occurs (at which point it reverts to consensus).  Aaron Bates
has -1 the laziness, and thus this is now a consensus vote.  Thus, we
need 3 +1 votes and no -1 votes in order to adopt the proposal.  [*]

I'd like to start with my +1 for the proposal.  It doesn't have any 
compatibility impact since almost all the code has been added since the 
last collections release, and will make usage of the API much more 
straightforward.  Maintenance may require more effort, but the proposal 
allows for reducing the maintenance if required (i.e. move the static 
inner classes as top level classes in a subpackage). 


[*] See:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <>
For additional commands, e-mail: <>

View raw message