commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
Subject Re: [PATCH[ [BETWIXT] various..
Date Fri, 14 Jun 2002 05:11:59 GMT


I'm just saying we should use a snapshot build (as we do in maven of
jelly). Not using a later maven because it hasn't released seems silly. If
we applied the same scenario to maven, we'd have to stop development - no
jelly, jexl, werkz etc.

Maven is in beta - what's a release? a beta release??
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting

                    Jon Scott                                                            
                    Stevens              To:     Jakarta Commons Developers List <>
                    <jon@latchkey.       cc:                                          
                    com>                 Subject:     Re: [PATCH[ [BETWIXT] various.. 
                    06/14/02 02:52                                                       
                    Please respond                                                       
                    to "Jakarta                                                          

on 6/13/02 8:48 PM, "James Strachan" <> wrote:

> From: "Jon Scott Stevens" <>
>> on 6/13/02 6:09 AM, "Bemt, Martin van den" <>
> wrote:
>>> Btw Is it ok if I update the site with the cvs version of maven or do
> you
>>> prefer to just use a released version? (the one you are using).
>> -1 on cvs of maven.
>> Only use released versions please.
> So should we scrap all websites for non-released components? e.g. all
> components in the sandbox?
> James

I think you guys are missing my point. I'm saying that we should ONLY use
released versions of maven to build projects. Just like we only use
versions of Ant.

Putting a dependency on a cvs head version of maven is not good.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <>
For additional commands, e-mail: <>

To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <>
For additional commands, e-mail: <>

View raw message