commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jack, Paul" <>
Subject RE: [Collections] Naming conventions
Date Fri, 14 Jun 2002 20:08:07 GMT
> we could even make them public classes and allow users to 
> extend them on 
> their own (using the XXXUtils.whatever methods as convenience methods)

Well, yes...but we'd be adding like 30 classes to the public API.
Maybe have a separate package for decorators?

> FactoryUtils could still be used.  Then, if later we add 
> another type of 
> factory (I have *no* idea what though), we can keep all the factory 
> methods in FactoryUtils.  
> And actually, we could rename SimpleObjectFactory to just 
> plain Factory.  

I'm all for that.  


To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <>
For additional commands, e-mail: <>

View raw message