on 6/13/02 10:11 PM, "dion@multitask.com.au" <dion@multitask.com.au> wrote:
> I'm just saying we should use a snapshot build (as we do in maven of
> jelly). Not using a later maven because it hasn't released seems silly. If
> we applied the same scenario to maven, we'd have to stop development - no
> jelly, jexl, werkz etc.
Maven works as is against the current b4 release of Maven. If you want to
use a new feature in CVS head of Maven, then wait for the next release of
Maven.
The *same* thing has been decided for Ant usage in projects as well. I don't
know of a single project in Jakarta that relies on the CVS head release of
Ant.
> Maven is in beta - what's a release? a beta release??
Since there hasn't been a 1.0 yet, yes. Once there is a 1.0, then that will
become the version that we depend on and we will no longer depend on
beta's...only final releases.
-jon
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
|