Yes,
it is good to have common process to build commons,
I prefer minimalism for building,
it is very good to have tools for site generation and dependency download,
but they must not be a dependency to build "jar" or to run tests.
Users and contributors must be able to build code and to run tests as
trivial as possible.
At 08:16 2002.06.24 -0500, Michael A. Smith wrote:
>On 24 Jun 2002, John Keyes wrote:
> > Folks the discussion here should not be about what GUMP is or
> > what Maven is. It should be about standardizing the build
> > process for Commons.
>
>Hmmm... Maybe I should have been paying more attention to this thread.
>I didn't realize there was talk about standardizing build process for
>all of commons.
>
> > It seems that the general consensus is that to satisfy all
> > parties there should be two ant projects, build.xml and
> > build-maven.xml. Could this issue be resolved with just one
> > project, build.xml.
> >
> > The default target for this project must generate the binary
> > distribution. If the default target is 'dist' then both scenarios
> > could be accomodated as follows:
>
>I'm not so sure about tha. Currently, collections has the tests run as
>the default project (compiling anything as necessary). I feel it's a
>good thing to have the full test suite run by default, and I wouldn't
>want that to change
>
> > <target name="dist" depends="ant-dist, maven-dist"/>
> >
> > <target name="ant-dist" unless="maven.home">
> > ...
> > </target>
> >
> > <target name="maven-dist" if="maven.home">
> > ...
> > </target>
>
>regards,
>michael
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
|