commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Scott Sanders" <ssand...@nextance.com>
Subject RE: JEX wants to play in the sandbox - license issue
Date Wed, 12 Jun 2002 17:41:43 GMT
Check out the cocoon cvs, as the entire xml.apache project has either
removed bad jars, or included a license with non-Apache jars.

Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Royal [mailto:proyal@apache.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 8:38 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: JEX wants to play in the sandbox - license issue


On Wednesday 12 June 2002 09:35 am, Dmitri Plotnikov wrote:
> Before I drop it in the sandbox, I want to make sure it is ok that JEX

> depends on Rhino, which is under a license that is a combination of 
> GPL, LGPL and MPL.  I read the parts of that license I could 
> understand and it appears to be ok to include JS.jar wholesale without

> infecting Apache with GPL, but I am not a lawyer, so I cannot be 
> absolutely sure.
>
> Could somebody clarify this license issue, please.

Cocoon (another apache project) also includes rhino.jar. I believe it
was 
present the last time jars were audited.

IANAL tho :)
-pete

-- 
peter royal -> proyal@apache.org

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message