commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Stephen Colebourne" <scolebou...@btopenworld.com>
Subject Re: [Collections] Naming conventions
Date Sat, 22 Jun 2002 12:18:21 GMT
Arron,
We are not breaking backwards compatability with a release here. Yes we are
refactoring, but to get to something manageable in the longer term.

Could you clarify - are you calling a vote on the final scheme?

Stephen

From: "Arron Bates" <commons-dev@keyboardmonkey.com>
To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2002 12:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Collections] Naming conventions


> Looks like I'm catching up on the end of this process but anyways...
>
> I diasagree with the creation of larger black boxes absorbing classes
> like LazyCollections. To the end developer it's easier to recognise pick
> up on and use them separated as they are. Some of the classes are
> already big enough, so it's only going to make our lives harder.
>
> Anyways, I'm just one of many. I think that it should be put to vote as
> "Naming Conventions" doesn't tell developers looking over the list that
> a large refactoring is up to bat.
>
> -1 for now, and 0 for my vote. I would just like a few more eyes on
> this.
>
>
> For convenience of the vote, here's an archive of the thread...
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=102398907200001&r=1&w=2
>
>
> Arron.
>
>
>
> On Sat, 2002-06-22 at 20:11, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> > From: "Michael A. Smith" <michael@iammichael.org>
> > > > > > However, I currently like what is outlined above. Any further
> > > > > > views? Does it
> > > > > > need a vote? And if not, can we record this discussion in a
readme
> > or
> > > > > > something so it is clear to developers as to what the
> > > > > > convention is?
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure we need to take a formal vote.  Everyone participating
on
> > > > the mailing list seems to agree (either implicitly by not saying
> > > > anything or with explicit approval).  I'll commit it into CVS
tonight
> > > > and if anyone objects, they can just -1 my patch and we'll see if we
can
> > > > address the reasons for the veto.
> > >
> > > I didn't get to formatting all the naming conventions into a suitable
> > > format for checking into CVS.  Spent too much time trying to figure
out
> > > why tests were failing in JDK 1.2, but not in 1.3 and 1.4 (see the
> > > commit message a couple of minutes ago).
> > >
> > > I'll get to it, just not today.
> >
> > I'm assuming you were referring to the document, not the changes to the
> > code. Any problems with me becoming a committer to collections making
the
> > changes to PredicateUtils and LazyCollections to bring them in line?
> >
> > Stephen
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message