commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Scott Sanders" <ssand...@nextance.com>
Subject RE: The Comprehensive Java Archive Network
Date Wed, 03 Apr 2002 19:13:10 GMT
I completely agree with 1, 2, and 4.  I have no comment on the fugly ;-)

Scott

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jon Scott Stevens [mailto:jon@latchkey.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 9:56 AM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: The Comprehensive Java Archive Network
> 
> 
> on 4/2/02 10:17 PM, "ringo.desmet@mediagenix.com" 
> <ringo.desmet@mediagenix.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hello Jon,
> > 
> >> I would be completely against putting anything related to CJAN on 
> >> SF.net.
> >> 
> >> But that is my own very biased opinion.
> > 
> > May we also know your argumentation for this?
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > Ringo
> 
> 
> #1. I don't trust that SF.net will be around long enough to 
> sustain something that needs to last for decades.
> 
> #2. I don't trust that SF.net won't go out of business and 
> suddenly turn off their resources and leave tons of people stranded.
> 
> #3. I think the SF.net software is fugly.
> 
> #4. I work for CollabNet.
> 
> -jon
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> <mailto:commons-dev-> unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For 
> additional commands, 
> e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message