commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Andrew C. Oliver" <acoli...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [logging] Need interface... VOTE
Date Fri, 05 Apr 2002 18:56:39 GMT
If all you're talkng about is new interfaces/classes to support the 
"push" method and this won't affect the "pull" method then why wouldn't 
you just put them in the existing package?  eh?   How does they're 
existance hurt me if I chose not to use them?

-Andy

costinm@covalent.net wrote:

>On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Michael A. Smith wrote:
>
>>this seems contradictory to me.  On one hand you say "no need for another 
>>package" and on the other "create a package.... would be useful". 
>>
>
>No need for another package with Log interface and pull.
>Usefull for another package ( if he can't convince those who voted -1 to 
>switch ) with the push interface and maybe management interfaces.
>
>Costin
>
>>This seems contradictory again.  "put LogUser in a separate pacakge" and 
>>"+1 on putting LogUser in o.a.c.l".  Am I missing something?  
>>
>
>He has my +1 for o.a.c.l, but I've seen few -1s around. If he can't 
>get those changed, a separate package for LogUser is the only solution.
>
>
>>Oh, and "we are all saying - put LogUser in a separate package"?  I'm not.  
>>If it goes in, I think it should go in the o.a.c.l package.
>>
>
>I agree - if the -1 are changed.
>
>If not - a separate package ( i.e. in sandbox - if he can't get it 
>accepted in o.a.c.l ) is the only solution ( and nobody can stop that ).
>
>Costin
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message