commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Craig R. McClanahan" <craig...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [pool] 1.0 release soon (was RE: [pool] PROPOSAL: add collecting of statistics to pool implementations)
Date Mon, 29 Apr 2002 19:58:27 GMT


On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Waldhoff, Rodney wrote:

> Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 14:48:18 -0500
> From: "Waldhoff, Rodney" <rwaldhof@us.britannica.com>
> Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List <commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
> To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' <commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
> Subject: [pool] 1.0 release soon (was RE: [pool] PROPOSAL: add collecting
>      of statistics to pool implementations)
>
> > I'd like to do one in the next day or so, if
> > there are no remaining gotcha bugs.
>
> I added an abstract BaseObjectPool this morning, for forward compatibility.
> I'd like to do the same for KeyedObjectPool, but it shouldn't take very
> long.
>

+1.

> I've been expanding the docs a bit today, but that could continue after a
> 1.0 release, it's really just improving the online site.
>

Either way is fine with me.

> If anyone is strongly bothered by ObjectPool.numIdle() and
> ObjectPool.numActive() versus the getXXX() style, now might be the right
> time to change it, although it may already be too late depending upon how
> broadly pool is being used.
>

How about adding getXxx() versions, implement the old ones in terms of
them, and deprecate the old ones?

> Thoughts?
>

Craig



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message