Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 22881 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2002 01:52:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Mar 2002 01:52:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 21042 invoked by uid 97); 19 Mar 2002 01:52:28 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 21019 invoked by uid 97); 19 Mar 2002 01:52:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 8980 invoked by uid 50); 19 Mar 2002 01:30:11 -0000 Date: 19 Mar 2002 01:30:11 -0000 Message-ID: <20020319013011.8979.qmail@nagoya.betaversion.org> From: bugzilla@apache.org To: commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Cc: Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7226] - Nested Bean Collection X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7226 Nested Bean Collection ------- Additional Comments From arron@keyboardmonkey.com 2002-03-19 01:30 ------- Isn't this almost just a case of semantics?... ...simply shorthand for property[x].property[y] where it just cuts out the middle-man (middle-bean?). It's more of a change to BeanUtils isn't it?... having to account for just this special case. Can I get an example where a common nested structure wouldn't reach?... -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: