commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "otisg" <ot...@iVillage.com>
Subject RE: Minimum JDK version for HttpClient
Date Thu, 28 Mar 2002 16:32:34 GMT
There is also a HTTPClient library at www.innovation.ch somewhere that
probably works with JDK 1.2.2 that you may want to use, instead of
hacking Jakarta's HTTP Client to support that version of JDK.

Otis
_______________________________________________________________
Get your own FREE email account at iVillage.com!
http://webmail.ivillage.com 

<-----Original Message----->
> 
> From: ringo.desmet@mediagenix.com
> Sent: 3/28/2002 12:12:47 PM
> To: commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Minimum JDK version for HttpClient
> 
> Hello,
> 
> JDK1.2.2 is old and is not worth supporting, but the new 
> GCJ3.0 and J2ME ( 
> 
> The statement above gives me the impression that the author is working
in an
> environment where he can set the platform (development and/or
deployment)
> defaults himself. I'm working for a company where I can't make the
decisions
> on what tools to use and on what versions of JDK etc to deploy.
HTTPClient
> would have been a good candidate for integration in one of our
products, but
> if JDK 1.2 is not supported, we can't use it since our development
tool at
> the moment is VisualAge for Java 4.0 (which only supports JDK 1.2). If
the
> two mentioned methods are the only methods that are not in a 1.2 JDK,
would
> it be that hard to make us, people that are stuck at 1.2, happy by
changing
> this?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Ringo
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> For additional commands, e-mail:


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message