commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Scott Sanders" <ssand...@nextance.com>
Subject RE: org.apache.commons.digester.Rule constructor...
Date Wed, 13 Mar 2002 04:35:07 GMT
I would think that it should be deprecated.

Scott

> -----Original Message-----
> From: robert burrell donkin [mailto:robertdonkin@mac.com] 
> Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 12:25 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: org.apache.commons.digester.Rule constructor...
> 
> 
> hi james
> 
> i've committed changes along the lines you suggested,
> 
> i haven't deprecated the old constructor taking a digester as 
> a parameter 
> - yet. do people think that it should be deprecated?
> 
> - robert
> 
> On Saturday, March 9, 2002, at 12:51 AM, James Carman wrote:
> 
> > Why does the Rule class only provide a constructor that takes a 
> > Digester
> > parameter?  It is very annoying to have to provide a 
> constructor for 
> > rules!  Why can't you just add a setDigester() method to 
> the Rule class 
> > and let a the Digester instance pass itself to it when the 
> addRule() 
> > method is called (did that make sense)?  Could a default 
> constructor and 
> > a setDigester() method be added to future releases of the 
> Rule class?
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> <mailto:commons-dev-> unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For 
> additional commands, 
> e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message