commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From robert burrell donkin <>
Subject Re: org.apache.commons.digester.Rule constructor...
Date Mon, 11 Mar 2002 20:25:26 GMT
hi james

i've committed changes along the lines you suggested,

i haven't deprecated the old constructor taking a digester as a parameter 
- yet. do people think that it should be deprecated?

- robert

On Saturday, March 9, 2002, at 12:51 AM, James Carman wrote:

> Why does the Rule class only provide a constructor that takes a Digester 
> parameter?  It is very annoying to have to provide a constructor for 
> rules!  Why can't you just add a setDigester() method to the Rule class 
> and let a the Digester instance pass itself to it when the addRule() 
> method is called (did that make sense)?  Could a default constructor and 
> a setDigester() method be added to future releases of the Rule class?

To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <>
For additional commands, e-mail: <>

View raw message