Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 65365 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2002 17:17:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Feb 2002 17:17:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 25370 invoked by uid 97); 19 Feb 2002 17:17:47 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 25354 invoked by uid 97); 19 Feb 2002 17:17:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 25343 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2002 17:17:46 -0000 Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 12:17:44 -0500 (EST) From: X-X-Sender: To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: Collections 2.0? (Collections 1.1 RIP) In-Reply-To: <3C7283A9.5050306@apache.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N While my question is for new functionality I'd like to get in before a 2.0 release, Berin's raises a good point. Is there a whole list of 'things that ought to be done' we could compile for Collections? Then target 2.0 with an aim to clear those up? Hell, Collections is pretty small, we could go through it a component at a time and solicit opinions, then solve and tick off, then declare 2.0? Is there a list of changes from 1.0 that are being made to 2.0? Should 2.0 enforce a Java 1.2 usage? Just ideas.. Bay On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Berin Loritsch wrote: > bayard@generationjava.com wrote: > > Where should comparators go by the way? > > > > in > > > > collections.compare > > collections.comparator > > collections > > comparator > > compare > > > If you upgrade to Collections 2.0, then you might as well > upgrade the PriorityQueue interface and implementing classes > to work with Objects instead of Comparables. That was what > the intent was. > > > > -- > > "They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety > deserve neither liberty nor safety." > - Benjamin Franklin > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > For additional commands, e-mail: > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: