Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 98506 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2002 03:30:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Feb 2002 03:30:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 3132 invoked by uid 97); 4 Feb 2002 03:30:52 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 3084 invoked by uid 97); 4 Feb 2002 03:30:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 3073 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2002 03:30:51 -0000 Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2002 22:30:46 -0500 From: "Geir Magnusson Jr." Subject: Re: [Logging] [VOTE] Commons Logging 1.0 Release In-reply-to: To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.0.0.1309 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 2/3/02 10:25 PM, "Sam Ruby" wrote: > Ted Husted wrote: >> >> As for myself, I'm in the camp that says the sky isn't falling. > > +1 > Why is this issue presented as a strawman of cataclysmic disruption, rather than a small adjustment towards further conformance to a very successful model? -- Geir Magnusson Jr. geirm@optonline.net System and Software Consulting "Now what do we do?" -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: