Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 74193 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2002 18:57:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Feb 2002 18:57:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 27051 invoked by uid 97); 4 Feb 2002 18:57:06 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 27023 invoked by uid 97); 4 Feb 2002 18:57:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-process-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: Reply-To: commons-process@jakarta.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list commons-process@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 27013 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2002 18:57:05 -0000 Message-ID: <921E60ADEB30D84EACA350AD31A1FD7506E2A8@chiex02> From: "Waldhoff, Rodney" To: "'commons-process@jakarta.apache.org '" Subject: RE: ANNOUCEMENT: new mailing list: commons-process@jakarta.apache .org Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 07:01:38 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) List-Subscribe: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C1AD7C.14DBBEA0" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C1AD7C.14DBBEA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > I'd like to suggest that all mail not > specifically related to code issues > move over to this new list. Any issues > about how fine the line is between > code issues and non-code issues should > move to the new list. Any discussion > about how (in)appropriate my creating > this new mailing list should move to > the new list. :), cute I'm actually not sure that I have a complaint, I'm just curious if I missed it or something. Was this idea discussed somewhere? Care to comment on what led to commons-process (given that there's no, say, ant-process or tomcat-process or for that matter even a jakarta-process (although jakarta-gereral may be seen that way I guess))? - Rod ------_=_NextPart_001_01C1AD7C.14DBBEA0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable RE: ANNOUCEMENT: new mailing list: = commons-process@jakarta.apache.org

> I'd like to suggest that all mail not
> specifically related to code issues
> move over to this new list.  Any issues =
> about how fine the line is between
> code issues and non-code issues should
> move to the new list.  Any discussion =
> about how (in)appropriate my creating
> this new mailing list should move to
> the new list.

:), cute

I'm actually not sure that I have a complaint, I'm = just curious if I missed it or something. Was this idea discussed = somewhere? 

Care to comment on what led to commons-process (given = that there's no, say, ant-process or tomcat-process or for that matter = even a jakarta-process (although jakarta-gereral may be seen that way I = guess))?

 - Rod

------_=_NextPart_001_01C1AD7C.14DBBEA0--