Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 42376 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2002 18:47:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Feb 2002 18:47:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 20365 invoked by uid 97); 17 Feb 2002 18:47:02 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 20349 invoked by uid 97); 17 Feb 2002 18:47:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 20338 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2002 18:47:01 -0000 Message-ID: <2a2001c1b7e2$e0765d70$9865fea9@spiritsoft.com> From: "James Strachan" To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" References: <3C6FF800.B2A3F550@nitesco.com> Subject: Re: commons messenger Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 18:42:37 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi Thomas From: "Thomas Marsh" > All: > > I didn't see a -user list for commons, so I'm posting this here. If > there is a better place to post this, please let me know. This is the best place to post. > Has anyone used commons messenger with IBM's MQSeries? Not yet AFAIK - though modifying the Messenger.xml config file a little and it should work fine with MQSeries - if you get it working let us know and we can add the MQ config file to CVS. We've already got config files for JBossMQ, SpiritWave and AshnaMQ. > I'm working on a project which will use IBM Websphere 4.0 Advanced > Edition, which supports EJBs, but not MDBs. Should be fine. Though if you're building a mostly EJB based system then maybe MDBs might help - its worth taking a look at them. If you can't use MDBs for any reason then Messenger is a great (simple) alternative without requiring an EJB2.0 container - it'll work just fine in Tomcat. > I figured we would have to write a listener, which would then pass off > the message ID to a SLSB Whats an SLSB? > , which would then pull the message off the > queue, run thru the business logic, and commit it. > > It looks like I could use the commons messenger classes to do some, if > not all of this work. > > Am I barking up the right tree? No I think you're certainly barking up the right tree. Messenger should make it a little easier to work with JMS and if you're not using MDBs then Messenger also provides a JMS 'application server' that can be deployed in any Servlet engine, such as Websphere, to manage your subscriptions. So it should be a good fit. James _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: