commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From <bay...@generationjava.com>
Subject RE: Dependency question
Date Thu, 21 Feb 2002 04:57:36 GMT

Yes and no. I'm in favour with it as a general idea, though it seems a
bigger step than just moving Utils into main cvs and cleaning shop. There
would still need to be a util package though.

Some of the components in Utils are real java.util style components.

On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Scott Sanders wrote:

> Perhaps we should not name something so generic as util in commons
> proper.  Perhaps we should have io, lang, text as Java does?  Anyone?
>
> Utils could stay in the sandbox as the 'sorting' place?
>
> Scott
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Daniel Rall [mailto:dlr@finemaltcoding.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 7:13 PM
> > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> > Subject: Re: Dependency question
> >
> >
> > <bayard@generationjava.com> writes:
> >
> > > On that note, how about a Lang sub-project for
> > core-language helpers.
> > > Number/Date/String/Url/File helpers etc.
> >
> > This is basically what I see Util as, a little bit of
> > java.lang, java.util, and perhaps java.text.
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > <mailto:commons-dev-> unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> > For
> > additional commands,
> > e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> >
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message