commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sam Ruby" <>
Subject Re: [Logging] [VOTE] Commons Logging 1.0 Release
Date Sun, 03 Feb 2002 22:21:31 GMT
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>>> Without resorting to legal reasons, and actually going into the
>>> hypothetical, why wouldn't we let Bryan into the sandbox to pursue Simper
>>> with other Commons committers?
>> I don't hand out the karma around here, so it's not my decision.
> It's a group decision.
>> If someone asked me to vote on the idea of opening a Jakarta CVS to a
>> non-committer, I would vote -1.
> You are missing the point, I think.
> We as a group decide to make new people  committers all the time.  They are
> 'non-committers' before we do that.
> I was once a 'non-committer' and then I became a 'commiter'.
> In previous posts, you suggested that the specific rules of Commons
> prevented us from deciding to bring someone into the fold, specifically into
> the sandbox.  "Our hands are tied" was your specific statement, which was
> never clarified...
>> But I believe the people to ask if the idea is even valid would be Sam,
>> Brian, and Roy.
> You want me to ask Sam Brian and Roy if we can bring in new committers?

I must confess that I had exactly the same reaction that Geir did upon
reading Ted's mail...

To me "giving someone access to CVS" === "making someone a committer"

- Sam Ruby

To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <>
For additional commands, e-mail: <>

View raw message