Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>
>>> Without resorting to legal reasons, and actually going into the
>>> hypothetical, why wouldn't we let Bryan into the sandbox to pursue Simper
>>> with other Commons committers?
>>
>> I don't hand out the karma around here, so it's not my decision.
>
> It's a group decision.
>
>> If someone asked me to vote on the idea of opening a Jakarta CVS to a
>> non-committer, I would vote -1.
>
> You are missing the point, I think.
>
> We as a group decide to make new people committers all the time. They are
> 'non-committers' before we do that.
>
> I was once a 'non-committer' and then I became a 'commiter'.
>
> In previous posts, you suggested that the specific rules of Commons
> prevented us from deciding to bring someone into the fold, specifically into
> the sandbox. "Our hands are tied" was your specific statement, which was
> never clarified...
>
>> But I believe the people to ask if the idea is even valid would be Sam,
>> Brian, and Roy.
>
> You want me to ask Sam Brian and Roy if we can bring in new committers?
I must confess that I had exactly the same reaction that Geir did upon
reading Ted's mail...
To me "giving someone access to CVS" === "making someone a committer"
- Sam Ruby
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
|