commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Paulo Gaspar" <paulo.gas...@krankikom.de>
Subject RE: [PROPOSAL] Commons-USER, Commons-DISCUSS
Date Mon, 04 Feb 2002 16:23:19 GMT
> I am not completely sure if we should have general. If general is not
> for the discussion of general jakarta issues, what is its role then?

Correction:
  I am not completely sure if we should have discuss-jakarta.

Paulo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paulo Gaspar [mailto:paulo.gaspar@krankikom.de]
> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 2:49 PM
> To: commons-process@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Commons-USER, Commons-DISCUSS
>
>
> I sure agree that a name like discuss would remove more noise from dev
> and makes sense for most projects.
>
> I am not completely sure if we should have general. If general is not
> for the discussion of general jakarta issues, what is its role then?
>
> I don't really get the jakarta-dev and jakarta-user ideas either and
> I would not like to have a zillion more mailing lists to follow.
>
>
> Have fun,
> Paulo
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ted Husted [mailto:husted@apache.org]
> > Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 2:16 PM
> > To: commons-process@jakarta.apache.org
> > Subject: [PROPOSAL] Commons-USER, Commons-DISCUSS
> >
> >
> > There wasn't any discussion, Sam just took the initiative (way to go
> > Sam!).
> >
> > I'm thinking that adding a DISCUSS (or PROPOSAL) list to the standard
> > array makes sense, and it's something that the other subprojects might
> > consider.
> >
> > <ot>I'm also thinking that maybe we should have a Jakarta-DISCUSS and
> > Jakarta-DEV list too. The first being where the "code convention"
> > threads can go, and the second being reserved to VOTES and other
> > business before the PMC. And maybe a Jakarta-USER to replace General.
> > Why not keep using the same wheels?</ot>
> >
> > But my proposal is to add a Commons-USER and Commons-DISCUSS list to the
> > resources offered by the commons.
> >
> > -Ted.
> >
> >
> > > "Waldhoff, Rodney" wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'd like to suggest that all mail not
> > > > specifically related to code issues
> > > > move over to this new list.  Any issues
> > > > about how fine the line is between
> > > > code issues and non-code issues should
> > > > move to the new list.  Any discussion
> > > > about how (in)appropriate my creating
> > > > this new mailing list should move to
> > > > the new list.
> > >
> > > :), cute
> > >
> > > I'm actually not sure that I have a complaint, I'm just curious if I
> > > missed it or something. Was this idea discussed somewhere?
> > >
> > > Care to comment on what led to commons-process (given that there's no,
> > > say, ant-process or tomcat-process or for that matter even a
> > > jakarta-process (although jakarta-gereral may be seen that way I
> > > guess))?
> > >
> > >  - Rod
> >
>


Mime
View raw message