commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Paulo Gaspar" <>
Subject RE: [Logging] [VOTE] Commons Logging 1.0 Release
Date Mon, 04 Feb 2002 11:43:55 GMT

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Geir Magnusson Jr. []
> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 4:28 AM
> We have the ability to affect change on this thing I believe is a problem.
> (One answer is "It's not a problem" I suppose...)
> The only answers I hear are "Things are fine" or "Tomorrow..." or "That's
> prevented by the rules".

And IT IS prevented by the rules. A lot of people would veto the kind
of nastiness you are afraid of and the mess would be rolled back.

> I know it's hypothetical, and has been ruled to be a waste of
> bandwidth, but
> what about the "log4j crew" vs "logkit crew" in the the "everyone gets to
> vote irrespective of contribution" model?

AFAIK only some of us are proposing such model to be applied to the
whole Jakarta (and I am NOT one of them).

Besides, a lot of people (including me) would prefer to have BOTH
LogKit and Log4J and veto such mess.

I also think that both logging teams, although not always very wise,
are still much wiser than that.

> geir

Have fun,

To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <>
For additional commands, e-mail: <>

View raw message