commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Gerhard Froehlich" <>
Subject RE: [simplestore] AccessControl
Date Thu, 21 Feb 2002 11:37:39 GMT
>> Ok I see. I will start with some simple read and write security impl.
>> I think that comes "permission on method and class" relativ near, or?
>> For that I will create an own sub-package
> Ok?
>> This will be the place for implementations. I will start
>> implementing this and then we will see how this object stuff fits in.
>> Maybe PersistenProxy gets an second constructor, or something else to
>> this securtiy things or not.
>> What do you think?
>1.Yes permission on method or class is the same for implementation.
>2.implementation for* is good idea

Ok kool. BTW I see no need to implement an extra interface for that. Just 
implementing the securtiy.acl interfaces is ok, or? Or do you want an extra 
interfaces in our commons.simplestore.persistence package?


Boren's Law: When in doubt, mumble. 

To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <>
For additional commands, e-mail: <>

View raw message