commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@optonline.net>
Subject Re: [Logging] [VOTE] Commons Logging 1.0 Release
Date Mon, 04 Feb 2002 11:39:35 GMT
On 2/4/02 6:43 AM, "Paulo Gaspar" <paulo.gaspar@krankikom.de> wrote:

> Inline...
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:geirm@optonline.net]
>> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 4:28 AM
>> 
>> We have the ability to affect change on this thing I believe is a problem.
>> (One answer is "It's not a problem" I suppose...)
>> 
>> The only answers I hear are "Things are fine" or "Tomorrow..." or "That's
>> prevented by the rules".
> 
> And IT IS prevented by the rules. A lot of people would veto the kind
> of nastiness you are afraid of and the mess would be rolled back.

Well it isn't actually, but I've been told to shut up, so I'll leave it
here.
 
> 
>> I know it's hypothetical, and has been ruled to be a waste of
>> bandwidth, but
>> what about the "log4j crew" vs "logkit crew" in the the "everyone gets to
>> vote irrespective of contribution" model?
> 
> AFAIK only some of us are proposing such model to be applied to the
> whole Jakarta (and I am NOT one of them).
> 
> Besides, a lot of people (including me) would prefer to have BOTH
> LogKit and Log4J and veto such mess.

I want both too. 
 
> I also think that both logging teams, although not always very wise,
> are still much wiser than that.
> 

I know. I have high regard for Ceki and Peter.  That's why its hypothetical.

geir

-- 
Geir Magnusson Jr.                       geirm@optonline.net
System and Software Consulting
You're going to end up getting pissed at your software
anyway, so you might as well not pay for it. Try Open Source.



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message