Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 93689 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2002 12:05:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Jan 2002 12:05:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 9011 invoked by uid 97); 30 Jan 2002 12:05:20 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 8995 invoked by uid 97); 30 Jan 2002 12:05:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 8975 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2002 12:05:19 -0000 Reply-To: From: "Paulo Gaspar" To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Subject: RE: [Logging] [VOTE] Commons Logging 1.0 Release Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 13:21:31 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi Geir, Knowing both code bases I would say that Avalon is better in 1) but as nothing in 2). For my logging wrapper I am using Avalon stuff for the wrappers and Velocity stuff as a base for detection and configuration... and for the Primordial Logger, which no one is talking about but that I find a great idea. Have fun, Paulo Gaspar > -----Original Message----- > From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:geirm@optonline.net] > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 12:56 PM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [Logging] [VOTE] Commons Logging 1.0 Release > > ... > > Just to throw another log on the fire... > > We did too in Velocity-land, and built the following, a while ago : > > 1) Simple interface through which Velocity would happily log into any > supplied class/object that supported that interface. > > 2) 'Autodetection' - when the user didn't specify the logsystem they > preferred, we would look for log4j or logkit in the classpath, and use > whatever we found. That means that you can just put the log4j.jar or > logkit.jar into the classpath, and velocity will automatically > log to a file > using that system. > > My point? I don't know - just noting that there are others in > jakarta-land > with similar problems and solutions (like Paulo...) > > > -- > Geir Magnusson Jr. geirm@optonline.net > System and Software Consulting > You're going to end up getting pissed at your software > anyway, so you might as well not pay for it. Try Open Source. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: