Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 12923 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2002 19:10:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jan 2002 19:10:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 25375 invoked by uid 97); 9 Jan 2002 19:09:45 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 25354 invoked by uid 97); 9 Jan 2002 19:09:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 25331 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2002 19:09:45 -0000 Reply-To: From: "Paulo Gaspar" To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Subject: RE: [Vote] ARMI to move Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 20:25:31 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 In-Reply-To: <458473676F1AC74A84EAB2F22004DA6DD874@mail.nextance.com> Importance: Normal X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N That should be fixed. Due to its nature, it will soon become impossible to have 3/4 of all the Commons committers to pay attention to something in the same week! Have fun, Paulo Gaspar > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Sanders [mailto:ssanders@nextance.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 7:44 PM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: RE: [Vote] ARMI to move > > > According to the wesite, you are correct. I thought it was different. > > Scott > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Martin Cooper [mailto:martin.cooper@tumbleweed.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 10:36 AM > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > > Subject: Re: [Vote] ARMI to move > > > > > > No, I don't think so. The positive super-majority is based on > > the number of subproject (i.e. Commons) committers, not the > > number of package (i.e. ARMI, in this case) committers. So > > basically, it needs 3/4 of all Commons committers to approve. > > At least, that's how I read it. > > > > -- > > Martin Cooper > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Scott Sanders" > > To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" > > Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 10:08 AM > > Subject: RE: [Vote] ARMI to move > > > > > > It looks like you have the positive super majority. We > > should wait a while longer before moving it, so any lingering > > votes can come out. > > > > Scott > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Martin Cooper [mailto:martin.cooper@tumbleweed.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 10:11 AM > > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > > > Subject: Re: [Vote] ARMI to move > > > > > > > > > > Don't you need more active committers? > > > > > > Interesting question. My initial assumption was that, yes, > > that's what > > > the rules say. However, on checking the Commons charter, it doesn't > > > actually say how many committers are required for a package to be > > > accepted (or if it does, I missed it). The Jakarta rules do, of > > > course. Perhaps this is something we should define? > > > > > > The vote for acceptance, however, is well defined as a positive > > > super-majority. > > > > > > -- > > > Martin Cooper > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Geir Magnusson Jr." > > > To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" > > > > > Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 7:50 PM > > > Subject: Re: [Vote] ARMI to move > > > > > > > > > > Don't you need more active committers? > > > > > > > > > > > > On 1/6/02 6:35 PM, "Paul Hammant" wrote: > > > > > > > > > Folks, > > > > > > > > > > http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-commons-sandbox/armi/ > > > > > > > > > > I have done a lot of work on ARMI and think it is time > > > for me to ask > > > > > committers to vote for a move of this tool from 'sandbox' > > > in to the > > > > > main CVS tree. It also needs a rename (ARMI is already > > > used in the > > > > > context of Java by another academic team). Please do not > > > think of > > > > > this as a full replacement for RMI. It is merely an > > alternative > > > > > that bizarely might be most useful (to Avalon) entirely > > > inside one > > > > > VM. > > > > > > > > > > With respect to the rename, I think FacadePublisher gives > > > the most > > > > > meaning, but is not snappy. > > > > > > > > > > Now, I guess I have no vote myself as I am only a committer to > > > > > 'soapbox' but I would be interested to know if know the > > > outcome of a > > > > > vote from those that do...... > > > > > > > > > > Two votes: > > > > > > > > > > 1) for ARMI being renamed to FacadePublisher (or other) > > > > > > > > > > 2) for migrating from 'soapbox' to main CVS. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance.... > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > - Paul H > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Geir Magnusson Jr. > > > geirm@optonline.net > > > > System and Software Consulting > > > > "He who throws mud only loses ground." - Fat Albert > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org> > > > For > > > additional commands, > > > e-mail: > > > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org> > > For > > additional commands, > > e-mail: > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org> > > For > > additional commands, > > e-mail: > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: