Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 47985 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2002 18:44:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jan 2002 18:44:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 17337 invoked by uid 97); 15 Jan 2002 18:44:59 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 17301 invoked by uid 97); 15 Jan 2002 18:44:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 17290 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2002 18:44:58 -0000 From: "Gerhard Froehlich" To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Subject: RE: [simplestore] inital check in Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 19:05:22 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 In-reply-to: X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N >-----Original Message----- >From: Tom Klaasen (TeleRelay) [mailto:tom.klaasen@telerelay.com] >Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 6:06 PM >To: Jakarta Commons Developers List >Subject: RE: [simplestore] inital check in > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Juozas Baliuka [mailto:baliuka@mwm.lt] >> Sent: dinsdag 15 januari 2002 18:37 >> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List >> Subject: RE: [simplestore] inital check in >> >> >> Hi, >> I think simple store is too simple :). >> I see some things to do for simple store. >[...] >> 4. Ability to register and call stored procedures on sorage : >> registerProcedure(String alias,ProcedureDescriptor p); >> Object retValueOrValues = call(alias,paramArray); > >A Cache should not be responsible for storing, should it? Then it isn't >a cache, but a DB... >And even if you're going to do this, make a clean separation between the >cache and the persistency layer (do not assume it is a database. It can >be a filesystem, or a WebDAV system, or a Jisp system, ...) > >I'm not even sure what you're going to do with this stored procedure... > > >Just giving my opinion, as I'm looking for a decent cache for some time >now and I'm considering using simplestore. +10 with you here. Maybe we should rename it into simplecache. Gerhard "God put me on this Earth to accomplish a certain number of things. Right now, I am so far behind I shall never die." -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: