Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 73688 invoked from network); 25 Jan 2002 00:30:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Jan 2002 00:30:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 19910 invoked by uid 97); 25 Jan 2002 00:21:21 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 19891 invoked by uid 97); 25 Jan 2002 00:21:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 19879 invoked from network); 25 Jan 2002 00:21:20 -0000 Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 19:18:22 -0500 From: "Geir Magnusson Jr." Subject: Re: JJAR (aka Car 54), Where Are You? [Was: Re: Commons Conventions innew Sandbox Projects] In-reply-to: <3C4DCE4D.BB4636EA@apache.org> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.0.0.1309 X-Spam-Rating: 64.125.133.20 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 1/22/02 3:40 PM, "Ted Husted" wrote: > Do we really need an automated repository, or just good conventions on > where the JARs for a released version can be found. If the JAR for > Digester 1.0 lived here > > http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-commons/release/commons-digester/v1.0> / > > would that be enough? We need automated for version and dependency fetching, I think. -- Geir Magnusson Jr. geirm@optonline.net System and Software Consulting You're going to end up getting pissed at your software anyway, so you might as well not pay for it. Try Open Source. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: