Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 76237 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2002 21:08:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jan 2002 21:08:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 4667 invoked by uid 97); 17 Jan 2002 21:08:28 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 4651 invoked by uid 97); 17 Jan 2002 21:08:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 4640 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2002 21:08:27 -0000 Subject: RE: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/logging/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 13:03:41 -0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Message-ID: <458473676F1AC74A84EAB2F22004DA6DD93E@mail.nextance.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/logging/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging Thread-Index: AcGfkXh4DJJZCDGLRmG0DTl5ktRSIAACPK6Q From: "Scott Sanders" To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N +1 > -----Original Message----- > From: robert burrell donkin [mailto:robertdonkin@mac.com]=20 > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:05 PM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: cvs commit:=20 > jakarta-commons/logging/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging >=20 >=20 > On Thursday, January 17, 2002, at 06:38 PM, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: >=20 > > On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, robert burrell donkin wrote: >=20 > >=20 > >> i had intended to remove AbstractLog (since it's no longer needed)=20 > >> and remove the associated test cases and so on. can i=20 > start on those=20 > >> or are you still working on some more changes? > >> > > > > I don't have any more changes planned. > > > > However, I had thought about removing AbstractLog as well=20 > ... but left=20 > > it in because SimpleLog still used it. Now that we've streamlined=20 > > everything, that is probably not necessary any more, so go=20 > ahead and=20 > > remove it (and change SimpleLog to "implements Log" instead). > > > > After that, I'm going to want to propose a release of this=20 > API so that=20 > > others can start depending on it. That means we need to be=20 > happy with=20 > > it first, of course, because incompatible changes later=20 > (like adding=20 > > anything new in the Log interface) will be frowned upon. >=20 > agreed :) >=20 > i think that the log level constants should be removed from the Log=20 > interface as well. The only class that should be using them=20 > is SimpleLog=20 > and they can be added to that. shall i make that change as well? >=20 > - robert >=20 >=20 > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: =20 > unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org> > For=20 > additional commands,=20 > e-mail: >=20 >=20 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: