Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 96993 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2002 18:31:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jan 2002 18:31:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 6908 invoked by uid 97); 9 Jan 2002 18:31:24 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 6881 invoked by uid 97); 9 Jan 2002 18:31:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 6870 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2002 18:31:23 -0000 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: RE: [Logging] default log level Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3 Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 10:26:51 -0800 Message-ID: <458473676F1AC74A84EAB2F22004DA6DD872@mail.nextance.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [Logging] default log level Thread-Index: AcGZMY35QC0bsDTeR/WRpmtHs8C2RAACYtlw From: "Scott Sanders" To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N After using Digester last night at the INFO level, I would actually say that INFO is indeed to high a level as a default. I would say either WARN or ERROR. Scott > -----Original Message----- > From: Morgan Delagrange [mailto:mdelagra@yahoo.com]=20 > Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 9:22 AM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [Logging] default log level >=20 >=20 > WARN would be my inclination. INFO is more suited to=20 > high-level debugging than an ordinary production environment. >=20 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Scott Sanders" > To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" > Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 6:38 PM > Subject: RE: [Logging] default log level >=20 >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:craigmcc@apache.org] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 4:35 PM > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > > Subject: RE: [Logging] default log level > > > > > > Shouldn't the logging level be inherited from the > > underlying logging > > > > configuration? If I set a particular level in my Log4J > > or JDK 1.4 > > > > configuration file, *that* is what I want to use, right? > > > > > > Yes, for Log4J and LogKit and JDK1.4 this should be the > > case, but for > > > the SimpleLog, we need to pick one right? > > > > > > > Thats true ... and I'm open to any of the choices. I just=20 > didn't want=20 > > to see us overriding the undelying logging package's configuration. >=20 > Agreed. I will go with Paolo on the choice of INFO. >=20 > Scott >=20 > > > > > Scott > > > > > > > Craig >=20 > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail:=20 > unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org> > For=20 > additional commands,=20 > e-mail: >=20 >=20 >=20 > _________________________________________________________ >=20 > Do You Yahoo!? >=20 > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: =20 > unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org> > For=20 > additional commands,=20 > e-mail: >=20 >=20 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: