Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 36886 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2002 19:50:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jan 2002 19:50:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 23530 invoked by uid 97); 9 Jan 2002 19:50:46 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 23514 invoked by uid 97); 9 Jan 2002 19:50:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 23503 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2002 19:50:45 -0000 Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 11:50:39 -0800 (PST) From: "Craig R. McClanahan" To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL](Logging) correcting unconventional variable names in SimpleLog In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20020109114931.D89703-100000@icarus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: localhost 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N +1 to both going ahead and changing the variable names in SimpleLog, to Robert doing the grunt work on that :-), and to having per-subproject standards documented on the web site (NOT myself volunteering yet for that, but might have time in a few days). Craig On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, robert burrell donkin wrote: > Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 19:41:42 +0000 > From: robert burrell donkin > Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: [PROPOSAL](Logging) correcting unconventional variable names in > SimpleLog > > (i've put this in a separate email to make it easier for people who aren't > interested to ignore the flames...) > > as jon pointed out, i didn't correct the unconventional variable names in > SimpleLog when i committed those changes. i've been thinking about this > and i think now that they should be corrected and i'm willing to do the > work. > > obviously this is a starting +1. > > > > i'm not bothered what our coding conventions are - it's just that they > should be documented. at the moment we've inherited the jakarta general > coding conventions but these are pretty much ignored. if people want > different conventions for jakarta-commons they should draw up a proposal > and put it to the vote. > > i'd be very happy for each sub project to have it's own coding conventions > - provided that there are documented. without documentation i'd say that > any code formatting that isn't compliant with the general jakarta > guildlines should be fair-game for anyone who's bother enough to correct > it. > > - robert > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > For additional commands, e-mail: > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: