Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 70726 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2002 22:01:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jan 2002 22:01:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 4642 invoked by uid 97); 8 Jan 2002 22:01:54 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 4626 invoked by uid 97); 8 Jan 2002 22:01:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 4567 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2002 22:01:53 -0000 Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 14:01:46 -0800 (PST) From: "Craig R. McClanahan" To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [Logging] default log level In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20020108140049.K12403-100000@icarus.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: localhost 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, robert burrell donkin wrote: > Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 21:35:32 +0000 > From: robert burrell donkin > Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: [Logging] default log level > > we should have a standard default log level. i'm not bothered whether it's > INFO, ERROR or OFF - but i do think that all our Log implementations > should use the same default. > > anyone have a preference? > Shouldn't the logging level be inherited from the underlying logging configuration? If I set a particular level in my Log4J or JDK 1.4 configuration file, *that* is what I want to use, right? > - robert > Craig -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: