Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 40071 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2002 23:27:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Jan 2002 23:27:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 7982 invoked by uid 97); 29 Jan 2002 23:27:15 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 7965 invoked by uid 97); 29 Jan 2002 23:27:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 7938 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2002 23:27:14 -0000 Message-ID: <031e01c1a91c$5ca83330$6501a8c0@apache.org> From: "Remy Maucherat" To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" References: <20020129120220.L84772-100000@icarus.apache.org> <3C571C8C.30807@apache.org> <02a601c1a914$4b0b33f0$6501a8c0@apache.org> <200201292320.g0TNK0407123@mail012.syd.optusnet.com.au> Subject: Re: [Logging] [VOTE] Commons Logging 1.0 Release Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 15:26:16 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Rating: localhost.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > On Wed, 30 Jan 2002 09:28, Remy Maucherat wrote: > > If we both want to move forward, I think now that you got your quote, you > > should withdraw your -1. > > Actually I think if "we" want to move forward I should add my -1. That way it > may become even more obvious what an absurd rule allows people to vote on > something they dont use/develope and never plant to use/develope. My +1 should read: - I plan to use it (actually, I just voted +1 on its use in Slide earlier today, before that release proposal was made). - I'm a committer on jakarta-commons, and I plan to submit patches if I find a bug. So I think it's perfectly valid. I fully reckon I never participated in its development, but I don't think it's relevant here. A release vote is a majority vote anyway. Remy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: