commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@optonline.net>
Subject Re: Commons Conventions in new Sandbox Projects
Date Fri, 25 Jan 2002 00:16:08 GMT
On 1/22/02 3:04 PM, "Sam Ruby" <rubys@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
>> 
>> UTIL        - Same issue as with GRAPH, and same question about whether
>>              minml2.jar is actually required or not.
> 
> Util makes no obvious references to sax that I can see.  It builds under
> Gump without this dependency just fine.
> 
> Note: by and large, I have avoided having Gump building components in
> sandbox until there was a subproject depending on them.  Didn't know how
> people would react, given it is a "sandbox" and all that.  Thoughts?
> 

It's a sandbox.  I think that we shouldn't be too particular, as we can (or
used to anyway...) gate upon entry into commons proper.  It's nice if people
followed the convention, but if they don't, they don't.

geir


-- 
Geir Magnusson Jr.                                     geirm@optonline.net
System and Software Consulting
"He who throws mud only loses ground." - Fat Albert


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message