commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@optonline.net>
Subject Re: [Vote] ARMI to move
Date Thu, 10 Jan 2002 02:05:50 GMT
On 1/9/02 1:10 PM, "Martin Cooper" <martin.cooper@tumbleweed.com> wrote:

>> Don't you need more active committers?
> 
> Interesting question. My initial assumption was that, yes, that's what the
> rules say. However, on checking the Commons charter, it doesn't actually say
> how many committers are required for a package to be accepted (or if it
> does, I missed it). The Jakarta rules do, of course. Perhaps this is
> something we should define?
> 

I think so - this issue is the motivation for me trying to get this
discussed.  The Jakarta rules do apply here.

It appears though that no one except me cares about that little problem, so
it must be my misinterpretation of something, which I will go back and
review.



> The vote for acceptance, however, is well defined as a positive
> super-majority.
> 
> --
> Martin Cooper
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Geir Magnusson Jr." <geirm@optonline.net>
> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
> Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 7:50 PM
> Subject: Re: [Vote] ARMI to move
> 
> 
>> Don't you need more active committers?
>> 
>> 
>> On 1/6/02 6:35 PM, "Paul Hammant" <Paul_Hammant@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Folks,
>>> 
>>> http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-commons-sandbox/armi/
>>> 
>>> I have done a lot of work on ARMI and think it is time for me to ask
>>> committers to vote for a move of this tool from 'sandbox' in to the main
>>> CVS tree.  It also needs a rename (ARMI is already used in the context
>>> of Java by another academic team).  Please do not think of this as a
>>> full replacement for RMI.  It is merely an alternative that bizarely
>>> might be most useful (to Avalon) entirely inside one VM.
>>> 
>>> With respect to the rename, I think FacadePublisher gives the most
>>> meaning, but is not snappy.
>>> 
>>> Now, I guess I have no vote myself as I am only a committer to 'soapbox'
>>> but I would be interested to know if know the outcome of a vote from
>>> those that do......
>>> 
>>> Two votes:
>>> 
>>> 1) for ARMI being renamed to FacadePublisher (or other)
>>> 
>>> 2) for migrating from 'soapbox' to main CVS.
>>> 
>>> Thanks in advance....
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> - Paul H
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
>>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Geir Magnusson Jr.                                     geirm@optonline.net
>> System and Software Consulting
>> "He who throws mud only loses ground." - Fat Albert
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
>> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> 

-- 
Geir Magnusson Jr.                                     geirm@optonline.net
System and Software Consulting
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message