commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@optonline.net>
Subject Re: [Vote] ARMI as Commons package +1
Date Thu, 10 Jan 2002 02:03:04 GMT
On 1/9/02 12:15 PM, "bayard@generationjava.com" <bayard@generationjava.com>
wrote:

> I'm a +1 on it being in Commons.
> 
> It's an itch that sounds very generic and reusable. Seems a good commons
> to me. I think the only question is whether something should move from the
> sandbox to commons without really gaining much peer review/use.
> 
> However, it sounds as though Avalon will have a dependency on it, in which
> case, should any Jakarta project that isn't in a sandbox be dependant on a
> sandboxed project?

That's up to them, isn't it?  The upside is that it motivates them to send a
crew over to help out :)

> 
> The Utils project in the sandbox is a project from which many projects
> grow, but it also has classes that belong in it. They're very usable but
> should other projects be dependent on them?
> 
> It seems that the obvious solutions conflict with each other.
> 
> Bay
> 
> On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Ted Husted wrote:
> 
>> Paul,
>> 
>> I believe that its possible that not enough of us understand the
>> background of the ARMI codebase.
>> 
>> There's a lot going on, and it can be helpful to spoonfeed us old,
>> feeble, and bandwith-challenged folk =:0)
>> 
>> Given the other tidbits that have come up in this thread, I would now
>> toss my binding
>> 
>> +1
>> 
>> It's important to understand that the sandbox is open to any Jakarta
>> committer, and it's helpful to make an actual proposal, as detailed in
>> the Commons charter, so that we know what's what.
>> 
>> If the component is also going to be useful to the Avalon codebase, then
>> I would say it has a high potential of being supported in the longterm,
>> and would be a welcome addition.
>> 
>> -- Ted Husted, Husted dot Com, Fairport NY USA.
>> -- Building Java web applications with Struts.
>> -- Tel +1 585 737-3463.
>> -- Web http://www.husted.com/struts/
>> 
>> 
>> Paul Hammant wrote:
>>> 
>>> Folks,
>>> 
>>>> 2) Take it back to excalibur and just shove it in (where it becomes a
>>>> tool amngst many that already have a community).
>>> 
>>> Actually I don't think this is so rude after all.  It is not like ARMI
>>> was commissioned or solicited for. I'll go back to where I came from,
>>> with the official vote being one for and one against.
>>> 
>>> - Paul H
>>> 
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>> <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>> <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
>> 
>> --
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> 

-- 
Geir Magnusson Jr.                                     geirm@optonline.net
System and Software Consulting
"Now what do we do?"


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message