commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Husted <>
Subject Re: [Vote] ARMI as Commons package +1
Date Wed, 09 Jan 2002 16:36:17 GMT

I believe that its possible that not enough of us understand the
background of the ARMI codebase. 

There's a lot going on, and it can be helpful to spoonfeed us old,
feeble, and bandwith-challenged folk =:0)

Given the other tidbits that have come up in this thread, I would now
toss my binding 


It's important to understand that the sandbox is open to any Jakarta
committer, and it's helpful to make an actual proposal, as detailed in
the Commons charter, so that we know what's what.

If the component is also going to be useful to the Avalon codebase, then
I would say it has a high potential of being supported in the longterm,
and would be a welcome addition.

-- Ted Husted, Husted dot Com, Fairport NY USA.
-- Building Java web applications with Struts.
-- Tel +1 585 737-3463.
-- Web

Paul Hammant wrote:
> Folks,
> > 2) Take it back to excalibur and just shove it in (where it becomes a
> > tool amngst many that already have a community).
> Actually I don't think this is so rude after all.  It is not like ARMI
> was commissioned or solicited for. I'll go back to where I came from,
> with the official vote being one for and one against.
> - Paul H
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <>

To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <>
For additional commands, e-mail: <>

View raw message