commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Donald <pe...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [Logging] [VOTE] Commons Logging 1.0 Release
Date Tue, 29 Jan 2002 22:55:23 GMT
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002 07:56, Waldhoff, Rodney wrote:
> > you may want to consider making the parameters
> > Strings not objects. They were made strings so that
> > you could render objects with Log4j. No other logging
> > toolkit does this. Thus if this is allowed/used you are
> > directly binding to Log4j anyway - why not use Log4j
> > directly in that case?
>
> What's it hurt to leave Objects in there? String.valueOf(object) is easy
> enough to do, and it supports the richer functionality provided by log4j.
> Why go out of our way to restrict functionality that's otherwise trivial to
> support?

Because it is not portable across different providers?

-- 
Cheers,

Pete

----------------------------------------------------------
Which is worse: Ignorance or Apathy? Who knows? Who cares?
----------------------------------------------------------

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message