commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Martin Cooper" <martin.coo...@tumbleweed.com>
Subject Re: [Vote] ARMI to move
Date Wed, 09 Jan 2002 20:24:02 GMT
I agree, the rule needs to be changed. I just counted 24 Commons committers.
Even if we only count active committers for a vote, the number already seems
untenable.

For the record, I think AltRMI coming to Commons would be "a good thing". I
do believe that we should follow the rules we have defined for ourselves,
though. So I say we define new criteria for bringing a project to Commons
first, and then vote on AltRMI according to the new criteria.

--
Martin Cooper


----- Original Message -----
From: "Paulo Gaspar" <paulo.gaspar@krankikom.de>
To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 11:25 AM
Subject: RE: [Vote] ARMI to move


> That should be fixed.
>
> Due to its nature, it will soon become impossible to have 3/4 of all
> the Commons committers to pay attention to something in the same week!
>
>
> Have fun,
> Paulo Gaspar
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Scott Sanders [mailto:ssanders@nextance.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 7:44 PM
> > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> > Subject: RE: [Vote] ARMI to move
> >
> >
> > According to the wesite, you are correct.  I thought it was different.
> >
> > Scott
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Martin Cooper [mailto:martin.cooper@tumbleweed.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 10:36 AM
> > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> > > Subject: Re: [Vote] ARMI to move
> > >
> > >
> > > No, I don't think so. The positive super-majority is based on
> > > the number of subproject (i.e. Commons) committers, not the
> > > number of package (i.e. ARMI, in this case) committers. So
> > > basically, it needs 3/4 of all Commons committers to approve.
> > > At least, that's how I read it.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Martin Cooper
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Scott Sanders" <ssanders@nextance.com>
> > > To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 10:08 AM
> > > Subject: RE: [Vote] ARMI to move
> > >
> > >
> > > It looks like you have the positive super majority.  We
> > > should wait a while longer before moving it, so any lingering
> > > votes can come out.
> > >
> > > Scott
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Martin Cooper [mailto:martin.cooper@tumbleweed.com]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 10:11 AM
> > > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> > > > Subject: Re: [Vote] ARMI to move
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Don't you need more active committers?
> > > >
> > > > Interesting question. My initial assumption was that, yes,
> > > that's what
> > > > the rules say. However, on checking the Commons charter, it doesn't
> > > > actually say how many committers are required for a package to be
> > > > accepted (or if it does, I missed it). The Jakarta rules do, of
> > > > course. Perhaps this is something we should define?
> > > >
> > > > The vote for acceptance, however, is well defined as a positive
> > > > super-majority.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Martin Cooper
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Geir Magnusson Jr." <geirm@optonline.net>
> > > > To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List"
> > > <commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
> > > > Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 7:50 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [Vote] ARMI to move
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Don't you need more active committers?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 1/6/02 6:35 PM, "Paul Hammant" <Paul_Hammant@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Folks,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-commons-sandbox/armi/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have done a lot of work on ARMI and think it is time
> > > > for me to ask
> > > > > > committers to vote for a move of this tool from 'sandbox'
> > > > in to the
> > > > > > main CVS tree.  It also needs a rename (ARMI is already
> > > > used in the
> > > > > > context of Java by another academic team).  Please do not
> > > > think of
> > > > > > this as a full replacement for RMI.  It is merely an
> > > alternative
> > > > > > that bizarely might be most useful (to Avalon) entirely
> > > > inside one
> > > > > > VM.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > With respect to the rename, I think FacadePublisher gives
> > > > the most
> > > > > > meaning, but is not snappy.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Now, I guess I have no vote myself as I am only a committer
to
> > > > > > 'soapbox' but I would be interested to know if know the
> > > > outcome of a
> > > > > > vote from those that do......
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Two votes:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1) for ARMI being renamed to FacadePublisher (or other)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2) for migrating from 'soapbox' to main CVS.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks in advance....
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - Paul H
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Geir Magnusson Jr.
> > > > geirm@optonline.net
> > > > > System and Software Consulting
> > > > > "He who throws mud only loses ground." - Fat Albert
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > <mailto:commons-dev-> unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> > > > For
> > > > additional commands,
> > > > e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > <mailto:commons-dev-> unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> > > For
> > > additional commands,
> > > e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > <mailto:commons-dev-> unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> > > For
> > > additional commands,
> > > e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message