commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Martin Cooper" <martin.coo...@tumbleweed.com>
Subject Re: [Vote] ARMI to move
Date Wed, 09 Jan 2002 18:36:09 GMT
No, I don't think so. The positive super-majority is based on the number of
subproject (i.e. Commons) committers, not the number of package (i.e. ARMI,
in this case) committers. So basically, it needs 3/4 of all Commons
committers to approve. At least, that's how I read it.

--
Martin Cooper


----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Sanders" <ssanders@nextance.com>
To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 10:08 AM
Subject: RE: [Vote] ARMI to move


It looks like you have the positive super majority.  We should wait a
while longer before moving it, so any lingering votes can come out.

Scott

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Cooper [mailto:martin.cooper@tumbleweed.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 10:11 AM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [Vote] ARMI to move
>
>
> > Don't you need more active committers?
>
> Interesting question. My initial assumption was that, yes,
> that's what the rules say. However, on checking the Commons
> charter, it doesn't actually say how many committers are
> required for a package to be accepted (or if it does, I
> missed it). The Jakarta rules do, of course. Perhaps this is
> something we should define?
>
> The vote for acceptance, however, is well defined as a
> positive super-majority.
>
> --
> Martin Cooper
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Geir Magnusson Jr." <geirm@optonline.net>
> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
> Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 7:50 PM
> Subject: Re: [Vote] ARMI to move
>
>
> > Don't you need more active committers?
> >
> >
> > On 1/6/02 6:35 PM, "Paul Hammant" <Paul_Hammant@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Folks,
> > >
> > > http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-commons-sandbox/armi/
> > >
> > > I have done a lot of work on ARMI and think it is time
> for me to ask
> > > committers to vote for a move of this tool from 'sandbox'
> in to the
> > > main CVS tree.  It also needs a rename (ARMI is already
> used in the
> > > context of Java by another academic team).  Please do not
> think of
> > > this as a full replacement for RMI.  It is merely an alternative
> > > that bizarely might be most useful (to Avalon) entirely
> inside one
> > > VM.
> > >
> > > With respect to the rename, I think FacadePublisher gives
> the most
> > > meaning, but is not snappy.
> > >
> > > Now, I guess I have no vote myself as I am only a committer to
> > > 'soapbox' but I would be interested to know if know the
> outcome of a
> > > vote from those that do......
> > >
> > > Two votes:
> > >
> > > 1) for ARMI being renamed to FacadePublisher (or other)
> > >
> > > 2) for migrating from 'soapbox' to main CVS.
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance....
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > - Paul H
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Geir Magnusson Jr.
> geirm@optonline.net
> > System and Software Consulting
> > "He who throws mud only loses ground." - Fat Albert
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> >
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:commons-dev-> unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For
> additional commands,
> e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message