Return-Path: 
 <commons-dev-return-811-qmlist-jakarta-archive-commons-dev=jakarta.apache.org@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@apache.org
Received: (qmail 54942 invoked from network); 15 Nov 2001 23:28:41 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Nov 2001 23:28:41 -0000
Received: (qmail 9663 invoked by uid 97); 15 Nov 2001 23:28:27 -0000
Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 9632 invoked by uid 97); 15 Nov 2001 23:28:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:commons-dev-subscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <commons-dev.jakarta.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 9597 invoked from network); 15 Nov 2001 23:28:26 -0000
Message-Id: <200111152310.fAFNAMS0000749@smtpout.mac.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 23:29:08 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.388)
From: robert burrell donkin <robertdonkin@mac.com>
To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v388)
In-Reply-To: <20011115114341.V59670-100000@localhost>
Subject: Re: [DIGESTER](SUBMIT) Combined patch (was [SUBMIT] Combined patch)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

On Thursday, November 15, 2001, at 07:46 PM, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:

<snip>

> Yep ... "ant clean dist test test.bpsr" on the current code gives only the
> one failure:
>
> testDigesterBodyTextStack(org.apache.commons.digester.BeanPropertySetterRuleTestCase)
> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Root body text not set correct.
> expected:<ROOT BODY> but was:<null>
>
> at line 272 of the test case.  This is on Linux (Red Hat 7.1) with the Sun
> JDK 1.3.1.

drat! that means that the body text bug hasn't been fixed completely (or 
my test code is wrong).

that's exactly is what i get - but it's cause is a little mysterious to me.
the string gets passed in ok but is then found to become strangely null 
when the processing has finished. the original version in the patch pushed 
strings onto the body text passed that test but now the string buffers are 
pushed, this problem seems to have occurred.

i'll probably have a chance to investigate the problem further at the 
weekend.

- robert

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>