Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 30151 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2008 18:50:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2008 18:50:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 5943 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2008 18:50:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-users-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 5892 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2008 18:50:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: users@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 5881 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2008 18:50:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:50:11 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:49:23 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JZ9Xj-0001qH-5s for users@cocoon.apache.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:49:43 -0700 Message-ID: <15985029.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:49:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Josh2007 To: users@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: 2.2 - problem with session between blocks - no access to session from block dependency In-Reply-To: <15920708.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: josh070713@gmail.com References: <15920708.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks Reinhard, I will get the last trunk. I will also think about a better way to avoid implicit contracts between servlets. Regards, Josh -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/2.2---problem-with-session-between-blocks---no-access-to-session-from-block-dependency-tp15920708p15985029.html Sent from the Cocoon - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@cocoon.apache.org